Sun 14 Jun 2009
Show vs. Tell vs. Nothing
Posted by Robert Swartwood under advice, craft, fiction
[4] Comments
I published a story a couple weeks back at Every Day Fiction called “Incomplete.” If you haven’t read it yet, go take a look. I’ll wait.
Back? Good.
The response to the story was quite positive. It’s great when readers leave comments or send e-mails about a story, but it’s simply amazing when they actually blog about a particular story, as Erica Naone did. If you haven’t read that yet, go take a look. I’ll wait.
Now in the blog post she talks about creating an ominous mood right off the bat with the very first line:
The men without faces came for his father just after dinnertime.
This is one of those stories that started out with just that first line. I had no idea where it was headed. I just let the story tell itself.
One thing I was quite aware about doing, however, was staying detached from the story. Oftentimes it seems writers care way too much about their characters, and in doing so they smother those characters with their writing that the reader finds themselves not caring much at all.
Anton Chekhov once said that the colder a writer is toward his characters, the more the reader will care for them.
(Well, I’m paraphrasing here, because I’d first heard that in an interview with Stewart O’Nan, and even then I think he may have been paraphrasing.)
But the idea is the less you show and tell, the more the reader will feel inclined to step in and fill in the blanks.
(Yes, yes, just like Hint Fiction!)
So in the scene where the boy — yes, I never gave him a name, which was intentional — found the envelope with his father’s thumbs, I never showed you his reaction. I left that reaction up to the reader, hoping they would then fill in the blank and feel the boy’s surprise and pain themselves.
I don’t think there’s a term for this, and quite frankly, I’ve retired from attempting to coin literary terms (might as well quit while I’m ahead, right?), but I’ve always thought of them as punchline stomps.
Like when you tell a joke, you get to that punchline and everyone laughs and has a good time … but if you keep going, past the point where you should have stopped, the joke loses its effectiveness.
The same thing goes for writing.
There are certain authors who know when to end a scene in the right place. Then there are certain authors who don’t, and who draw the scene out for another two or three or four pages.
How do you know when you’re stomping your punchlines?
Well, I’m not really sure. My suggestion is start at the very end of the scene or chapter or whatever, and start cutting. If you get to a point where you cut something and it takes away from the overall story, you know you’ve cut too much. After all, if you can cut and cut and none of it affects the story at all, what’s it doing there in the first place?
______________
Robert Swartwood has work forthcoming in Postscripts, Space and Time, Fifty-Two Stitches, and Wigleaf. His sf action novella The Silver Ring is available on Kindle or can be read for free at http://thesilverring.wordpress.com



Flash Fiction Chronicles is listed in the 2010 November/December issue of Writers' Digest as one of the 25 Best Online Consumer Magazine Markets for writers. 
Welcome Robert. Great post!
Good tips! I like the Chekhov line and agree. It’s one of those things you learn as a writer, a way to become detached. I really enjoyed “Incomplete.” This was a story that was a few days behind mine in EDF and I thought the voice was very compelling. It had a overall rhythm that worked so well! Thanks, A
Very good point on clipping stories beyond that punch line.
–dj
I agree about having that coldness towards characters…i’ve never really been one to give too much elaboration on my characters, i figure that a reader will understand a character if they use their own logic and reactions to fill in the blanks…that way they are more identifying with their own persona rather than one i have created.
Good post dude, keep it up.