Entries tagged with “CRAFT”.
Did you find what you wanted?
Sun 6 Oct 2013
Posted by Karen Nelson under INSPIRATION, INTERVIEWS, Karen Nelson, PUBLISHING, REVIEWS
by Karen Nelson
I love September because I can go all month singing Green Day’s “Wake Me Up When September Ends“. (The 9/11 Tribute video is gripping.) If you slept through any of Flash Fiction Chronicles’ great articles on the writing craft, here’s a recap – and wake up!
We had some pointed advice from Jim Harrington to help us refine our writing through Word Choice (be specific!) and using Inciting Incident and Character Arc to add dimension. Jim takes apart some sample writing to really examine the nuts and bolts of a piece, and I think you’ll find more than a few ideas for improving your work.
Ever revisit a favorite book and find it, somehow, lacking? You’re not alone. In “Writing Ruined My Reading” Sara Crysl Akhtar shares her struggles with Asimov, but finds a redeeming genre that will surprise you.
Beth Lee-Browning gets us digging into our journals and discovering our own potential with “If You Build It, They Will Come“. Her highlights are worth another look. (Go ahead, I’ve already clicked on them 4 times… )
• Savor life – live with humor, joy, and passion. Use feelings as fuel for creativity and creation.
• Make something of yourself – do something, be something, make something. Be who you are and continue to strive to become who you were meant to be. Don’t be afraid to try, don’t be afraid to fail, and don’t be afraid to succeed.
• Accept yourself – be yourself, trust yourself, be childlike, own and understand your relationships, be aware and follow your instincts, be accountable, and last but not least, be kind to yourself.
• Have faith – ask for and accept help, be teachable, life is spiritual, art is spiritual and it is healing. Follow your dreams and treat them as real.
• We commune through art – when we create from the heart and not from the ego we experience a clarity of purpose and feelings of joy.
For people who like writing, authors sure love to talk! And FFC has visited with some of the best in the business. Check out these conversations with industry professionals, and gain insight on the world of publishing…
UNCOV/RD: Susan O’Neill – author of Don’t Mean Nothing
Roxanne Gay – Tiny Hardcore Press
Sumanth Prabhaker – Madras Press
Milo James Fowler – EDF’s Top Author for August
Success for one is success for all, and FFC loves to celebrate our colleagues’ success! Our own Bonnie ZoBell burst into 2013 with her collection of stories The Whack-Job Girls (Monkey Puzzle Press).
“Respect. This is the bedrock of all the stories in Bonnie Zobell’s “Whack-Job Girls.” Her characters demand it, regardless of their situation, social standing and ethos. In fact, ZoBell’s characters come across as people who would sooner hit the reader with a hammer than be pitied.” – Rumjhum K. Biswas
Linda Simone-Wastila shares her thoughts on why Elliot Sanders’ Distance was one of the finest short stories she read this year. Take a moment as she walks you through the author’s expert use of voice, tension, detail, and theme.
Circle Straight Back by Noel Sloboda just went on my must-read list… if only for the intriguing idea of selling secrets in an online auction. Don’t miss Andree Robinson-Neal’s fascinating commentary on this unusual book.
Of course, when submitting your flash piece for publication, you want it to look its best. EveryDayFiction offers these insider tips that will get you that much closer to sharing your work.
The month wound up with a little fun, in Top 10 Reasons to Write Flash Fiction. Our staff collected their favorites, but we’re still hearing from you on your best – or craziest – reasons to write flash. Leave yours in the comment section – we’d love to hear it! And now that September has ended, get ready for a fabulous Fall at Flash Fiction Chronicles!
Karen Nelson is a writer and teacher in Southwest Missouri, specializing in educational and nonfiction works. She is a staff writer for Flash Fiction Chronicles, Curriculum Coordinator for Goldminds Publishing, author of four books and numerous stories and articles, and serves on the boards of various writing and literacy organizations. When staring at a computer screen gets to be too much, Karen wanders outside to her chickens, rabbits, and miniature horse, who are always good for gaining perspective.
Mon 11 Feb 2013
Posted by Jim Harrington under advice, CRAFT, Process
by Jim Harrington
I am, but I’m getting better. First, I have a confession. It’s not my fault!!
In seventh grade, the school placed me in a remedial English class due to a scheduling conflict. Because I did so well, I was assigned to the advanced class in eighth grade. I reveled in that accomplishment for about three days. That’s how long it took me to realize I was way behind everyone else in the class. Too embarrassed to admit I didn’t know what the teacher was talking about, I slogged through as best I could.
I still struggle with certain aspects of grammar. Here are some steps I took that might help readers who, like me, hold up a wooden cross whenever the word grammar appears.
Buy a style book*
It doesn’t matter which one, and you’re not going to read it cover to cover. I use it as a reference. For a while, I questioned every aspect of grammar from where that comma should go to am I supposed to capitalize the names of the seasons. I still use it from time to time. However, I find the more I write, the better I get at spotting errors.
Read for grammar, not for content
Pull a few novels off the shelf and read them for grammar and word usage, especially when looking at dialog. From a grammar standpoint, ask such questions as: Where is the punctuation placed prior to he said? If the dialog ends with a question mark, is the he capitalized? Does the question mark go inside or outside the quotation marks? Where do the quotation marks go when the dialog runs across two or more paragraphs? Why is there a comma in one sentence but not another? When looking at usage, ask why that word? To answer this, replace the word with something else to see how the flow and context change.
I need to add a caveat here. When choosing books for these exercises, select ones that were published a few years ago. Too many recent books suffer from a lack of editing. This is especially true of self-published books. Unfortunately, these authors fail to realize they are branding themselves as amateurs when they put a mistake-laden work on the market. Readers notice!
Follow online sites
There are sites online like Grammar Girl that provide insight into grammar issues. On this site, you can ask questions and sign up for a free newsletter.
Write shorter sentences
This may seem like silly advice, but I’ve read many submissions with grammar issues that could have been solved by, as John Gardner suggests, getting to the period sooner. There are times when using longer sentences helps set the tone, but incorrectly punctuated ones can create an unintended response in the reader.
Grammar counts! Many editors say they will forgive a few mistakes, but don’t usually say how many that is. Other editors simply pass on a work that doesn’t show a certain level of professionalism (i.e., poor grammar). Getting it right is important, whether it’s grammar, or plot, or overall storytelling ability. How the manuscript looks is just as important as what it has to say. Grammar errors and misspellings stick out. Don’t let your manuscript be the one the editor sets aside because of poor craftsmanship. Make it one of your writing goals for 2013 to improve your grammar skills, even if you think you know it all. How about a goal to learn one new grammar “rule” a month? Even the busiest writer should be able to accomplish that.
*Online style book links: The Elements of Style by William Strunk, Jr. and GrammarBook.Com by Jane Strauss.
Jim Harrington began writing fiction in 2007 and has agonized over the form ever since. He serves as the Flash Markets Editor for Flash Fiction Chronicles. Jim’s Six Questions For . . . blog provides editors and publishers a place to “tell it like it is.” You can read his stories at http://jpharrington.blogspot.com.
Thu 20 Dec 2012
by Aliza T. Greenblatt
Flash Fiction Chronicles interviewed Dustin Adams about Every Day Fiction’s Top Story for November, “The Gift“ a thought provoking tale about the dangers of knowing and not knowing.
ATG: A few weeks ago, you mentioned in a blog post that you were reeling from the news that “The Gift ” is one of the EDF’s top stories of all time. Have you gotten used to the idea yet?
DA: Is it still up there? Wait, don’t tell me. To be honest, I had to stop checking after the first two weeks. I took a screenshot and saved it as a .jpg, immortalized. I was glad to receive notification that this story was tops for November. Guess it’s still going strong.
What’s really fun is that where normally I’d social network the news of my story’s publication, but this came out on November 2nd, which was just after Superstorm Sandy. Thus, I had no power and didn’t get to tell those I know for a few days. By then, the story had reached #1 on its own.
ATG: Was there any particular prompt or inspiration for this piece? Did you have any specific goals when writing this story?
DA: I’m a bit of a shut in. I live in the middle of nowhere, and I work from home. So when I get around people, I often wish I already knew them, that they were old friends and we could shake hands and I’d ask how they’ve been.
Specifically, while sitting in an airport, I spotted an elderly man in a wheelchair. He was all alone, and I wanted to know his story. He’d had an entire life of experiences and stories and yet there he was just sitting there alone, smacking his dry lips together waiting for whoever plopped him there to return.
If I knew him, if everyone knew everyone, there would be no stranger barrier between us, and I could have kept him company. I like to think that loneliness would disappear because we’d all know each other’s plights and we’d all have empathy for each other.
Which brings me at last to the second part of your question. My goal was to show that Jessica, the main character, had no empathy. That the gift merely gave her information, but didn’t hurt in the way it pained the other two characters. Lines like: “I’m so sorry, Phil.” I said what I thought I should. and “But why was he crying?” were supposed to accomplish this, but my feedback has been that this didn’t quite hit that mark, but that it didn’t matter. (Whew!)
ATG: Can you tell me a little about your writing process?
DA: I don’t have a process per se. What I do is force myself to get up at 5AM every morning. (OK, sometimes I hit snooze once or twice.) I write every day unless I’m fighting a cold. I’m not a finesse writer, I write far more words than I submit, but I keep pounding away. Momentum is key.
ATG: Part of what I loved about this story was how just enough information was given to keep the reader comfortable, but not enough so that it ruined the mystery of the story. I think it’s safe to say that it’s the unanswered questions in this piece makes this story so captivating. Was it a struggle to find the right balance of information?
DA: One of my writing tips is to imagine dropping important information or backstory or scenery/sensory information into the story like chocolate chips. They usually take the form of a single sentence between longer paragraphs. They’re the sweet stuff. What’s a chocolate chip cookie without the chocolate chips?
My favorite chip is, “Jean glared at me.” Phil’s recent frown (read: cookie) sets this up. My hope was that aiming these negative words toward Jessica would alert the reader, subconsciously or consciously that we’ve turned a corner story-wise and that we’re sliding into a darker tale.
I’m not sure that answered the question. Was it a struggle? Indeed. When writing, everything makes perfect sense to the author, it’s only after others read it that we learn if what we wrote works or not. I’m glad this one did.
ATG: The main character, Jessica, argues that knowing her past actions without knowing her motivations paints an incomplete picture of her. Like seeing the final scores of a close game, but not the actual match. Do you think this was an oversight by the aliens or did they design The Gift so that humanity keeps asking questions about itself?
DA: I love the sports reference! That’s exactly right. I believe the aliens have no clue. They’re so used to being in each others heads that they have no idea the damage their gift causes when given to the inexperienced.
Imagine giving a car to an Australian Bushman. We all have cars, right? He could use one. First he’d be confused, then, when accepting this gift is part of his life, gets behind the wheel and promptly crashes.
ATG: What other projects are you working on now? Are there other stories of yours, either upcoming or published, that you can point readers to?
DA: Jennifer Campbell-Hicks (multiple EDF author) and I write one flash fiction a month, exchange with just each other, then submit. So to answer the question, I’m working on a flash. *grin*. I’m also perpetually editing my fourth novel. Before I’d written one, my plan was that the first three don’t count, and I’d submit the fourth. So far so good, but I’m afraid that’s hamstringing me into never actually finishing the darn thing. I want it to be perfect, and while I know that’s not possible, I continue to try.
I’ve got three stories here at EDF, and one elsewhere. The best place to keep up with my publications is on my blog. http://dustinadams.wordpress.com Although I don’t update it nearly as often as I’d like, the publication section is always current.
ATG: Thank you very much for taking the time to chat with us. Best of luck with all your writing endeavors.
Thank *you* for this opportunity. I want to give a quick shout out to Joseph Kaufman. Without his input, this story (and my other EDF stories) wouldn’t have been nearly as good. If anyone has a gift, it’s him.
Dustin Adams owns and runs his own Customs brokerage business. It’s an intense, mind-stimulating job that requires extraordinary focus and attention. He began writing short stories while in high school. Then for some unknown reason (video games) he stopped for a decade or so (really fun video games). Now, knocking loudly on age 40’s door, he’s writing full-on with piston engine fingers. He writes in the morning, in the dark, and has seen the sun rise several thousand times.
Aliza T. Greenblatt works in a firmly non-writing field when the sun is up and writes under a desk lamp at night. Fueled by a sheer love of books and a tyrannical imagination, she writes the stories that appear over her morning coffee and won’t leave her alone until they are put down on paper. She writes, raves, and blogs at http://atgreenblatt.com. and on Twitter @AtGreenblatt
Mon 20 Aug 2012
by Randall Brown
Desire, it is often, perhaps too often, said drives narrative into being, and there is not only the desire of the main character to consider, but the desire of Reader, Writer, and some believe, even the Text itself. When you write very short things, you are often told what your text really wants:
“It’s begging to be a short story.”
“I’m certain this piece wants to be a prose poem.”
“What your text really is, what it’s telling you it is and you can’t hear it but I can, is that it wants to be a novel, maybe even a trilogy.”
So, yes, flash texts yearn, and I wonder, perhaps too much, what they desire and from whom they want it. What does the flash text crave from its characters, its readers, its writers? These text whisperers, the ones who hear things in my texts, would have me believe that the flash text wants to be something other than it is. I doubt it. I’m certain of the flash’s desire to be what it is, but what other yearnings burn inside that flash? Here are six guesses about what a flash text wants.
- To recreate the world in its image. At the end of ”The Oven Bird,” Frost asks “What to make of a diminished thing?” That diminished has a number of meanings, like most things in Frost’s poems, but I’m drawn to “be-little” as a possible one. It’s the world that has become little, and Frost’s implied answer, or one such answer—”You give it a poem”—might lead some readers to think that the poem itself is a diminished thing, too. I don’t think so. Was it Frost who said, “The world isn’t fallen because Eve bit an apple, but because we believe she did?” Or was it someone writing about Frost? The point is that flash believes the world isn’t captured by words, but recreated by them. Each word carries that weight of re-creation (or is that recreation?), of procreation, of the compressed big bang. It’s the world stripped of the immaterial. It wants not the world as it is but the world as it might be, if flash were in charge.
- To matter. As most tiny things do, flash knows what you might think of it, its size associated with insignificance in your mind. Flash wants you to confess this thought, that you’re like the middle school social studies teacher who desires a full page for the “A.” Flash doesn’t fill pages the way those “A” students do. Flash must find other ways to matter, to add up to something, than the word after word, the failed action after failed action, the words chasing that hard-earned resolution, hard-earned because it took page after page to get there. Flash searches for the alternative way to matter in this world. Sometimes it finds profundity in what others find nothingness; other times, it finds meaning by eschewing their desire for somethingness. Flash doesn’t fit the tired, old rubrics; it needs another vision against which it gets it value.
- To be attended to. The process of reading a longer piece is the process of forgetting, so much so that I wonder if the novel, for example, works primarily subconsciously, as much an echo as a voice. A novel’s words want to disappear from consciousness, want to take root like the archetypal images of dreams. A flash’s words demand your attention, especially those (very) tiny flashes. A flash shouts out, “Attention must be paid!” It’s later flash wants to haunt you, like a flashback, a tiny moment in the midst of the ongoing narrative, a burst of something concentrated.
- To be inhaled. Sometimes, I think flash writers oversell the long hours spent working on a flash piece, as if they feel that anything so small must be defended as “work.” Having written and published longer pieces, I don’t feel that I constructed flash the way I did the longer pieces. Flash is okay coming out as an exhale, and I read somewhere that with each inhale, we take in the molecules from everyone who has ever lived. Maybe I made that up. I can’t remember. In any case, that exhale of flash adds your own nature to the nature of all that’s ever been. Flash is okay being easy to get out of your system. Flash doesn’t want to be constructed and deconstructed, taken apart in bites. Swallow me whole, flash says. That’s the way flash came into the world, the way it’ll go out.
- To be measured by its girth. If we were to check Flash Fiction’s in-box, we’d find spam after spam for Fiction Extender pills. Too tiny? Take two of these. Girth, that “measurement around the middle of something,” might be a better measurement of flash. Its breadth! And within that breadth exists both breath and bread, something maybe important, for flash is certainly bigger than a breath and smaller than a breadbox, and the point is what? Breadth has associated with it concepts such as range, extent, scope, depth, reach. Flash won’t be taking any pills; it knows there’s more to it than meets the eye.
- To be loved. Because it’s what we all want, isn’t it?, in spite of our protestations about rejection meaning anything to us. Flash wants your big, big love, and of course it wants to deserve your love, be worthy of it, doesn’t want it given just because it wants it. Flash wants maybe then, the possibility of your big love, the potentiality of it, the hope of it. Maybe flash wants more this than flesh. Maybe flash would burn skin and leave only bone.
This article was originally posted at Flash Fiction Chronicles on March 24, 2010.
Randall Brown is the author of the award-winning flash fiction collection Mad to Live (Flume Press 2008), a collection that has been recently republished by PS Books in Philadelphia as a Deluxe Edition with “bonus tracks.” Over 300 poems, essays, and short fiction pieces have appeared or are forthcoming in numerous literary journals and his work has received nominations for the Pushcart, O. Henry, Million Writers, and Best of Web Prizes—and has appeared in various anthologies, both here and abroad, including The Norton Anthology of Hint Fiction. In December 2010, he founded and currently manages Matter Press, a community-based, non-profit literary press that publishes an online literary journal (The Journal of Compressed Creative Arts). He also is the founder of FlashFiction.Net, a nationally recognized blog with a singular mission, “To prepare writers, readers, editors, and fans for the imminent rise to power of that machine of compression, that hugest of things in the tiniest of spaces: flash fiction!”
He can be reached at http://randalldouglasbrown.blogspot.com/.
Fri 6 Jul 2012
Posted by Jim Harrington under advice, characters
by Erin Entrada Kelly
As a journalist, you often find yourself interacting with people who normally wouldn’t find their way into your social circle. A few years back I found myself interacting with such people. They were a large Southern family who lived in a sprawling farmhouse and said their prayers every night. They ate healthy home-cooked meals together at the table. Their bookshelves were lined with photo albums for every milestone event, and every album was carefully detailed and labeled. Molly’s Wedding. Gretchen’s Senior Year. Girl Scouts. Each member of the family was clean, well-dressed, articulate and mannered. The working husbands had smiling wives. Each family member spoke in the same tone and octave, like they were all raised in a daily spew of soft-spoken pleases and thank yous.
Dinner was served promptly, of course – after grace.
While the others said their prayers, I scanned the room. As someone who keeps disorderly photos in boxes and never says grace before meals, something seemed completely off about this whole scenario. Perhaps I felt guilty for those two cigarettes I pitched out of the window on my way over or for the expletives I mumbled at every red light. All I knew was this: It all seemed too … something. Too ‘perfect,’ maybe. Like I’d stepped inside an episode of the Brady Bunch. I assumed that by the end of the night we would all learn a big life lesson and exit the living room to queued music that marked the end of our episode.
But just as I found myself wondering how I’d found myself having dinner with the Cleavers, I found myself wondering something else – something that most other writers would have wondered, since we are a cynical and suspicious bunch. What’s the real story here?
After all, you and I both know that no family is perfect. And there’s a reason for that—it’s because no person is perfect. Just as I had pitched two cigarettes out the window on my way over, every person saying grace at the dinner table had their own ill-mannered ways. They just weren’t showing them to me, and I don’t blame them. I was a stranger, after all, and while some people wear their faults proudly, others keep them secreted away behind formalities.
There was more to the Cleavers’ story than meets the eye. And the same should go for the characters we write.
I once workshopped a short story about a girl who had a close friendship with her father, but felt oddly distanced from her mother. Neil Connelly, the workshop leader, shook his head and said, “Something’s not right with this dad. He’s too … perfect. Can’t he have a drink or something?”
When I re-read the story, I saw his point. I had written the father as an all-around Great Guy, worthy of his daughter’s affection. But by making him such a Great Guy, I made him one-dimensional. He was a swell everyman with no faults. In other words: He wasn’t real.
We all know Great Guys who have drinks after work or get curt with their children. We know Great Guys who have flashes of selfishness or moments of irritated frustration. It doesn’t make them any less Great, but it does make them more real.
One of the ways writers develop memorable characters is by making them three-dimensional. Sure, they can say grace at the table and wipe the corners of their mouths with crisp dinner napkins, but if they don’t kick the dog or drop an F-bomb at some point, they just become boring. Unrealistic. Not believable. And if readers don’t believe our characters, they won’t be interested in them.
As writers, we’re tempted to drive our points home because we’re afraid our readers won’t “get it.” We don’t want to give the Nice Girl any bad traits, because we want our readers to understand that she is the Nice Girl. But Nice Girls are people, too.
That day in workshop, I learned a valuable lesson: Never make your character too much of anything. Never write them as too perfect or too evil. Characters are much more interesting when they have more than one side. It’s what makes them three-dimensional. It’s what allows your readers to relate to them so well.
We all have our good manners at the table and our bad manners in the car. Let your readers see both, and your characters won’t easily be forgotten.
Erin Entrada Kelly is staff editor for Flash Fiction Chronicles. Her fiction has been published widely in places like Keyhole Magazine, Monkeybicycle and the Kyoto Journal. She was short-listed for the Eric Hoffer National Fiction Prize and the Philippines Free Press Literary Award for Short Fiction. Her debut novel is forthcoming from HarperCollins’ Greenwillow Books. She currently works as a freelance fiction editor and is represented by the Jenks Agency. Read more at www.erinentradakelly.com. Find her on Facebook here.